<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why banishment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2409</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2409</guid>
		<description>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/11/scott_vs_comfort.php#comments

This is hilarious. Pee Zee lauds Eugenie Scott for &quot;shredding&quot; Ray Comfort, a Biblical fundamentalist. Why doesn&#039;t Eugenie Scott &quot;shred&quot; John A. Davison, or better yet, why doesn&#039;t Pee Zee Myers or Richard Dawkins &quot;shred&quot; him? I will tell you why. Because they are all terrified at the prospect. That is why. What a bunch of losers, carefully picking their victims. Dawkins is the perfect example, attacking Ken Miller, not because of their shared Darwinian mysticism, but only because Miller claims to be a Christian. Isn&#039;t that revealing? Cowardly trash like Scott, Myers and Dawkins make me sick. What single concrete fact has any Darwinian selectionist ever contributed to our understanding of phlogeny? If someone has an answer present it here. I don&#039;t think it can be done.

What is truly remarkable is the way Myers continues to praise Darwin&#039;s fantasy, the most sustained flight of unfettered human imagination in the history of written communication. Doesn&#039;t the poor soul yet realize that Natural Selection, the sine qua non of Darwin&#039;s fantasy, is anti-evolutionary, serving only to prevent speciation for as long as possible, with very few exceptions, a losing strategy as the fossil record has made very plain? I felt certain that both Dawkins and Myers had abandoned Natural Selection long ago. Myers has made it obvious that I was I was wrong. Never underestimate the insanity of a &quot;true believer!&quot;

It is hard to believe isn&#039;t it?

Not at all. There it is at the top of this message for all to see. 

It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.

I love it so!

&quot;A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.&quot;

P.S. I occasionally edit earlier comments so be sure to check to see if I have improved my earlier message as I just did this one on 7:00 am, November 2, 2009.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/11/scott_vs_comfort.php#comments" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/11/scott_vs_comfort.php#comments</a></p>
<p>This is hilarious. Pee Zee lauds Eugenie Scott for &#8220;shredding&#8221; Ray Comfort, a Biblical fundamentalist. Why doesn&#8217;t Eugenie Scott &#8220;shred&#8221; John A. Davison, or better yet, why doesn&#8217;t Pee Zee Myers or Richard Dawkins &#8220;shred&#8221; him? I will tell you why. Because they are all terrified at the prospect. That is why. What a bunch of losers, carefully picking their victims. Dawkins is the perfect example, attacking Ken Miller, not because of their shared Darwinian mysticism, but only because Miller claims to be a Christian. Isn&#8217;t that revealing? Cowardly trash like Scott, Myers and Dawkins make me sick. What single concrete fact has any Darwinian selectionist ever contributed to our understanding of phlogeny? If someone has an answer present it here. I don&#8217;t think it can be done.</p>
<p>What is truly remarkable is the way Myers continues to praise Darwin&#8217;s fantasy, the most sustained flight of unfettered human imagination in the history of written communication. Doesn&#8217;t the poor soul yet realize that Natural Selection, the sine qua non of Darwin&#8217;s fantasy, is anti-evolutionary, serving only to prevent speciation for as long as possible, with very few exceptions, a losing strategy as the fossil record has made very plain? I felt certain that both Dawkins and Myers had abandoned Natural Selection long ago. Myers has made it obvious that I was I was wrong. Never underestimate the insanity of a &#8220;true believer!&#8221;</p>
<p>It is hard to believe isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Not at all. There it is at the top of this message for all to see. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.</p>
<p>I love it so!</p>
<p>&#8220;A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.&#8221;</p>
<p>P.S. I occasionally edit earlier comments so be sure to check to see if I have improved my earlier message as I just did this one on 7:00 am, November 2, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2406</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2406</guid>
		<description>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/shocking_evidence.php#comments

Here is Paul Zachary Myers embracing Eugenie Scott and Michael Ruse. What more do we need to prove Myers&#039; rabid Darwinism?

It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.

It is hard to believe isn&#039;t it?

Not at all. There it is for all to see.

I love it so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/shocking_evidence.php#comments" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/shocking_evidence.php#comments</a></p>
<p>Here is Paul Zachary Myers embracing Eugenie Scott and Michael Ruse. What more do we need to prove Myers&#8217; rabid Darwinism?</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.</p>
<p>It is hard to believe isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Not at all. There it is for all to see.</p>
<p>I love it so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/i_get_email_45.php#comments

I find this thread from PeeZee Myers to be especially revealing. It seems some one wants to be released from Meyers&#039; &quot;dungeon&quot; so he can resume commenting on Pharyngula. As a charter inmate of the &quot;dungeon,&quot; I wouldn&#039;t dream of wanting to be removed from it. My presence there is the best proof imaginable that Myers fears me and my distinguished predecessors like the plague. My friend Martin is there too for the same reason. Like all other tyrants in history, Myers  puts his critics in prison presumably to rot away as he prevails. We all know the fate of such despots don&#039;t we? I recommend every thinking person visit the &quot;dungeon&quot; to see first hand the way Myers deals with his adversaries. The dungeon button is right there on the opening page, right along with his description of himself and his blog - 

 &quot;Random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal.&quot;

It is hard to believe isn&#039;t it?

Not at all. It is right there for all to see.

It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.

I love it so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/i_get_email_45.php#comments" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/i_get_email_45.php#comments</a></p>
<p>I find this thread from PeeZee Myers to be especially revealing. It seems some one wants to be released from Meyers&#8217; &#8220;dungeon&#8221; so he can resume commenting on Pharyngula. As a charter inmate of the &#8220;dungeon,&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t dream of wanting to be removed from it. My presence there is the best proof imaginable that Myers fears me and my distinguished predecessors like the plague. My friend Martin is there too for the same reason. Like all other tyrants in history, Myers  puts his critics in prison presumably to rot away as he prevails. We all know the fate of such despots don&#8217;t we? I recommend every thinking person visit the &#8220;dungeon&#8221; to see first hand the way Myers deals with his adversaries. The dungeon button is right there on the opening page, right along with his description of himself and his blog &#8211; </p>
<p> &#8220;Random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is hard to believe isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Not at all. It is right there for all to see.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.</p>
<p>I love it so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/they_really_are_that_crazy.php#comments

Here we see Pee Zee Myers attacking the idea of &quot;demons&quot; all the while that he is demonstrating that is what he is himself - &quot;a demon.&quot; His whole life has degenerated into a jihad against the Judeo-Christian ethic. It is too bad we can&#039;t exorcise this hideous demon from Myers. He is clearly &quot;possessed.&quot; What has he ever contributed to the great unsolved mystery of phylogeny? Absolutely nothing is my answer. Neither has his Old World counterpart Richard Dawkins. They are the final spastic twichings of the aimless, purposeless, infantile dream of Charles Robert Darwin, the most over rated figure in the history of science, a man whose magnus minimus &quot;On the Origin of Species&quot; contains not a word in support of its title, not a word.

I no longer wonder why they still pretend I and my predecessors do not exist. They and their thousands of devotees all suffer from the same congenital defect, a malaise which binds them all together into a lump of intractable, helpless, feckless goo. They have painted themselves into a cul de sac from which there is no escape.

&quot;Birds of a feather flock together.&quot;
Cervantes

I hope some devout and most likely anonymous Darwimp will have the courage to transmit this message to Pharyngula, or richarddawkins.net or After The Bar Closes or any of the other still surviving bastions of the atheist inspired mysticism known far and wide as Darwinism, the most long lived hoax in the history of science.

It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.

I love it so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/they_really_are_that_crazy.php#comments" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/they_really_are_that_crazy.php#comments</a></p>
<p>Here we see Pee Zee Myers attacking the idea of &#8220;demons&#8221; all the while that he is demonstrating that is what he is himself &#8211; &#8220;a demon.&#8221; His whole life has degenerated into a jihad against the Judeo-Christian ethic. It is too bad we can&#8217;t exorcise this hideous demon from Myers. He is clearly &#8220;possessed.&#8221; What has he ever contributed to the great unsolved mystery of phylogeny? Absolutely nothing is my answer. Neither has his Old World counterpart Richard Dawkins. They are the final spastic twichings of the aimless, purposeless, infantile dream of Charles Robert Darwin, the most over rated figure in the history of science, a man whose magnus minimus &#8220;On the Origin of Species&#8221; contains not a word in support of its title, not a word.</p>
<p>I no longer wonder why they still pretend I and my predecessors do not exist. They and their thousands of devotees all suffer from the same congenital defect, a malaise which binds them all together into a lump of intractable, helpless, feckless goo. They have painted themselves into a cul de sac from which there is no escape.</p>
<p>&#8220;Birds of a feather flock together.&#8221;<br />
Cervantes</p>
<p>I hope some devout and most likely anonymous Darwimp will have the courage to transmit this message to Pharyngula, or richarddawkins.net or After The Bar Closes or any of the other still surviving bastions of the atheist inspired mysticism known far and wide as Darwinism, the most long lived hoax in the history of science.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.</p>
<p>I love it so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>Martin

Good luck. Patrick was not a Darwinist. He was just a snotty little power-crazed nothing, sort of like Clive Hayden at Uncommon Descent. I doubt O&#039;Leary will respond. I want nothing further to do with Uncommon Descent. Why don&#039;t you forward one of my recent assaults to the folks at Uncommon  Descent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin</p>
<p>Good luck. Patrick was not a Darwinist. He was just a snotty little power-crazed nothing, sort of like Clive Hayden at Uncommon Descent. I doubt O&#8217;Leary will respond. I want nothing further to do with Uncommon Descent. Why don&#8217;t you forward one of my recent assaults to the folks at Uncommon  Descent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmartin1</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>vmartin1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve asked O&#039;Leary on UD if her blog is still under the control of a darwinist who banned you and me. Waiting for answer.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/9198/comment-page-1/#comment-337875</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked O&#8217;Leary on UD if her blog is still under the control of a darwinist who banned you and me. Waiting for answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/9198/comment-page-1/#comment-337875" rel="nofollow">http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/9198/comment-page-1/#comment-337875</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>Martin

That figures. I have had others do the same thing to me. They only shame themselves. By recounting your experience here you have exposed Dawkins&#039; fan club as no better than Pharyngula, EvC, Panda&#039;s Thumb and After The Bar Closes, just another Alamo for Darwinian mysticism. 

&quot;A doctrine which is unable to maintain itself in clear light, but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind with incalculable harm to human progress.&quot;
Albert Einstein. 

It is no longer sufficient to expose our adversaries. It is time to put them out of their self imposed mysery. I wouldn&#039;t miss it for the world!

It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.

I love it so!

&quot;A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin</p>
<p>That figures. I have had others do the same thing to me. They only shame themselves. By recounting your experience here you have exposed Dawkins&#8217; fan club as no better than Pharyngula, EvC, Panda&#8217;s Thumb and After The Bar Closes, just another Alamo for Darwinian mysticism. </p>
<p>&#8220;A doctrine which is unable to maintain itself in clear light, but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind with incalculable harm to human progress.&#8221;<br />
Albert Einstein. </p>
<p>It is no longer sufficient to expose our adversaries. It is time to put them out of their self imposed mysery. I wouldn&#8217;t miss it for the world!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.</p>
<p>I love it so!</p>
<p>&#8220;A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmartin1</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>vmartin1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>John, I would like to transfer your message, but those admin-idiots on rd.net have changed my password. That&#039;s probably the way they deal with opponents of their bizarre darwinian teaching. By changing your password. Would you believe it? 

When I wanted to reset my password I recieved this message:

&quot;You are not authorised to request a new password.&quot;

So I am not admitted to their hidden forum anymore. Those precious gentlmen can start their darwinian tea at five. Undisturbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I would like to transfer your message, but those admin-idiots on rd.net have changed my password. That&#8217;s probably the way they deal with opponents of their bizarre darwinian teaching. By changing your password. Would you believe it? </p>
<p>When I wanted to reset my password I recieved this message:</p>
<p>&#8220;You are not authorised to request a new password.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I am not admitted to their hidden forum anymore. Those precious gentlmen can start their darwinian tea at five. Undisturbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Davison</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>Martin

I cannot read this link so there is no point in presenting it to me. When a web log requires registration to read their schlock, it might as well not even exist. Am I the only one who cannot read what happens at richarddawkins.net? I would like to think so because that would prove that they fear me and my sources. To have secret discussions denied to the general public is the bottom of the intellectual barrel. Please, someone who can, transmit this comment to that miserable excuse for a &quot;forum.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin</p>
<p>I cannot read this link so there is no point in presenting it to me. When a web log requires registration to read their schlock, it might as well not even exist. Am I the only one who cannot read what happens at richarddawkins.net? I would like to think so because that would prove that they fear me and my sources. To have secret discussions denied to the general public is the bottom of the intellectual barrel. Please, someone who can, transmit this comment to that miserable excuse for a &#8220;forum.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmartin1</title>
		<link>http://jadavison.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/why-banishment/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>vmartin1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=18#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>My latest post to the cage of fools under the name RichardDawkins.net:

------

I wonder why this forum full of idiots doesn&#039;t have an unregister option.

Probably idiots who ar acting here as &quot;admins&quot; like to be the only ones who could ban you.

Anyway it was my pleasure gentlemen.

http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&amp;t=40293&amp;p=2354769#p2354769</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest post to the cage of fools under the name RichardDawkins.net:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>I wonder why this forum full of idiots doesn&#8217;t have an unregister option.</p>
<p>Probably idiots who ar acting here as &#8220;admins&#8221; like to be the only ones who could ban you.</p>
<p>Anyway it was my pleasure gentlemen.</p>
<p><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&amp;t=40293&amp;p=2354769#p2354769" rel="nofollow">http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&amp;t=40293&amp;p=2354769#p2354769</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
