jump to navigation

Evolution is finished! December 25, 2007

Posted by John A. Davison in general.
trackback

In 2004 I published a paper “Is Evolution Finished?” Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 97: 111-116. I now rearrange the words and offer it as a challenge to those who claim otherwise. 

It is my conviction that creative evolution is a phenomenon of the distant past. Just as ontogeny is a self-limiting process terminating in the adult organism and its subsequent death,  phylogeny has had a similar history resulting in the current biota. I see no evidence for the emergence of any new life forms, only trivial variations in existing species. In the distant past creative evolution and extinction were occurring simultaneously.  That is no longer evident. This idea is not original with me and has been suggested by such distinguished scientists as Robert Broom, Julian Huxley and Pierre Grasse. I have simply extended their conclusions to include true speciation. Stated another way, there is no longer a balance between creative evolution and extinction. Related to this sequence is the evidence that Homo sapiens seems to be the youngest mammal ever to appear which suggests a goal directed process, now complete. Extinction is rampant as fragile habitats are being destroyed by human activity and with them all those species restricted to those habitats. The exact number of known species is unknown with estimates ranging from one to ten million, but that tens of thousands of them have become and are becoming extinct cannot be denied. I know of not a single  replacement. If others think they do, please use this opportunity to identify it along with its immediate ancestor and the cytogenetic mechansim by which it was produced.

I realize this perspective is in marked contrast to the Darwinian model. I present it confident that the Darwinians will ignore this opportunity to defend their paradigm in open discussion. The atheist Darwinian establishment has traditionally pretended that they had no critics and I offer this challenge primarily to demonstrate to the scientific community that little has changed in the century and a half since the publication of Darwin’s “Origin of Species,” a book which offers, in my opinion, absolutely nothing of substance relating to its title. 

The reason that this challenge will not be met is because the “establishment” now realizes that their model is a dismal failure. Rather than admit that they have dedicated their professional lives to a phantom, they have chosen to lash out blindly at all who recognize that chance could never have had anything to do with the origin or the susequent history of either ontogeny or phylogeny.

“Neither in the one nor in the other is there room for chance.”
Leo Berg, Nomogenesis, page 134.

A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Comments»

361. John A. Davison - February 13, 2011

Gary Hitch,

At $28.00 each, no thanks. It is Paul Zachary Myers, Clinton Richard Dawkins and Wesley Royce Elsberry who need to be “whacked upside the head” as they say in Mississippi. They represent just the current crop of 152 years of denial that Darwinism ever had any critics. We critics have never been allowed to exist; they dare not let us exist. Try to find us in the Indices and Bibliographies of the enormous pro-Darwinian literature that dominates the shelves of the libraries of the world.

lol

That is the major reason I have written a book exposing them as the cowardly, insecure ideologues they all have always been, trapped by a congenital atheism which renders them utterly unaware of the world in which they find themelves.

It doesn’t get any better then this.

362. John A. Davison - February 13, 2011

http://tao.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=233

I am much too shy to respond to this so I will let others each judge for himself as to its accuracy. I will say this however. I never was a genius by the standard of an !Q of 150 or above. Furthermore, IQ declines with age so only God knows where mine is now. Judging by the way I have been treated by my adversaries. it must be in the room temperature range.

“I have always thought that a politician is to be judged by the animosities he excites among his opponents.”
Winston Churchill

Substitute “scientist” for “politician.”

363. John A. Davison - February 14, 2011

They cost $28.00 a pop. I’m surprised Myers and Dawkins haven’t added them to all the paraphernalia they are already selling adorned with the big red A for atheism. The Darwin Bobblehead should have a big red A branded on his forehead just like all those coffee mugs, Tshirts, jewelry and bumper stickers that Myers and Dawkins Inc. are peddling under the big red A that adorns each daily edition of hate speech at Pharyngula. Don’t take my word for it. Poke the big red A and “come out,” join the Crusade to replace the Judeo/Christian ethic with Universal Atheism – the “wave of the future, ” all presented in Dawkins’ own inimitable words. As a bonus you get a 38 second UTube of Dawkins explaining his own Red A lapel pin.

It is hard to believe isn’t it?

Not at all. It is a matter of record.

It doesn’t get any better than this!

364. John A. Davison - February 15, 2011

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/02/valentines_day_video_humans.php#comments

Here we find Myers resorting to soft porn to keep his mostly pseudonymous “minions” (his term) entertained. And Pharyngula is supposed to be a science blog?

It is hard to believe isn’t it?

Not at all. It is a matter of record.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

I love it so!

365. John A. Davison - February 20, 2011

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/02/uh-oh_students.php#comments

Here is a self confessed demonstration of Pee Zee Myers’ priorities. He would rather spread his venomous atheism far and wide, braving even the hazards of winter blizzards, than stay home to fulfill his responsibilities as a University Professor by meeting his class at 8:00 AM.

It is hard to believe isn’t it.

Not at all as the link makes obvious.

366. John A. Davison - February 22, 2011

http://tao.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=197&st=20&gopid=576&#entry576

Check out this comment I just left on Terry Trainor’s blog. Terry is the author of –

“Davison is the Darwinians’ worst nightmare.”

Of course he is which is why they pretend he doesn’t exist, just as they have pretended the following never existed either –

St George Mivart, William Bateson, Leo Berg, Henry Fairfield Osborn, Richard B. Goldschmidt, Otto Schindewolf, Pierre Grasse, Robert Broom and a host of other great scientists, not one a religious or atheist fanatic and not a Darwinian mystic in the lot.

367. John A. Davison - March 8, 2011

One of my favorite characters is Sam Goldwyn, responsible for some of the most memorable abuses of syntax ever recorded. I will offer some of his jewels in their original, altered ever so slightly to cast light on the Darwinian hoax. The substituted words are in italics.

“The reason so many people showed up at Darwin’s funeral is that they wanted to make sure he was dead.”

“Any man who needs Darwinism ought to have his head examined.”

“Give me a couple of centuries and I’ll make Darwinism an overnight sensation.”

“If Darwin were alive today, he’d turn over in his grave.” (The original was Roosevelt).

“Go see Darwinism and see for yourself why you you shouldn’t go see it.

368. John A. Davison - March 9, 2011

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/03/problem_diagnosed.php#comments

Poor Pee Zee Myers is being attacked. Who is surprised? He has managed to attack (his words) every Jew, Muslim and Christian on the planet. That does not leave very many unnamed victims.

Scienceblogs, Scientopia, Pharyngula, Panda’s Thumb, After the Bar Closes, EvC, richarddawkins.net – they are all the same, all frantically trying to preserve the Darwinian hoax. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to discover that they are now attacking one another to determine which one can be the most obnoxious to their common enemy, those of us who are convinced from birth that we live in a planned universe.

Cyberdumb is experiencing a record low in common decency, rational thinking and useful rhetoric. It has become an atheist Tower of Babel, dominated by some of the most useless, most vicious, most monumentally senseless and illiterate members of society ever simultaneously to occupy a single moment of time in the history of human communication.

As for the Darwinian hoax, let me quote what William Bateson, the father of modern genetics had to say –

“Although we must hold to our faith in the evolution of species, there is little evidence as to how it has come about, and no clear proof that the process is continuing at the present time.”
Address by the President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, August 20, 1914.

So you see it is not only John A. Davison who is convinced of a planned and now terminated phylogenesis no longer in progress. I am delighted to be able to join with great minds such as William Bateson, Pierre Grasse, Otto Schindewolf, Robert Broom, Leo Berg and Richard B. Goldschmidt, every one of whom proved, each in his own way, that Darwinism was a total disaster and should have been discarded the moment it appeared. That it still somehow survives is nothing short of a miracle unparalleled in the history of science. More than anything else it is symptomatic of what happens to every society when it abandons its God or Gods. The only question that remains is – what sort of Civilization will replace the one we now have, in what seems to this investigator to be in irreversible decay?

369. John A. Davison - March 11, 2011

http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/craig-venter-denies-common-descent-dawkins-incredulous/#comments

This is an interesting development with Craig Venter now denying common descent. In case anyone thinks this is a new notion, here is what Leo Berg had to say about common descent –

“Organisms have developed from tens of thousands of primary forms, i.e, polyphyletically.” (1922)

There is no more reason to assume common descent than there is to assume a creative role for natural selection. Every feature of the Darwinian model is imaginary, created out of thin air by one Charles Robert Darwin and subsequently perpetuated by six generations of equally muddle headed armchair mystics, not one of whom ever questioned any aspect of his 1859 brainchild. Darwin is still regarded as a genius, mostly by the English speaking world. If he was, he was the first genius who couldn’t master algebra and couldn’t read German. All he really accomplished was to offer the congenital atheists (like himself) an opportunity to gain a stranglehold on biological science. That stranglehold still prevails in the personas of Clinton Richard Dawkins, Paul Zachary Myers and Wesley Royce Elsberry, each also an armchair muddle headed mystic, like their founder Charles Robert Darwin. And like Darwin, they too attract their followers to perpetuate a congenital conviction that they all share. There is no God and there never were any.

Once again we see the wisdom of Cervantes –

“Birds of a feather flock togeher.”

I say, to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin –

“Since they hang together, let them hang together.”

“tis a consummation devoutly to be wish’d.”
William Shakespeare

It doesn’t get any better than this.

P.S. Benjamin Franklin had the perfect description of Pee Zee Myers and especially Richard Dawkins –

“A man wrapped in himself makes a very small bundle.”

370. John A. Davison - March 19, 2011

Let me remind my many readers that the title of this thread, “Evolution is finished,” has not yet evoked a single challenge.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

371. G. Hitch - March 19, 2011

Why? Simple. They’re afraid of you.
Their precious materialist theory is indefensible by evidence and good logic and they know you won’t accept just-so stories being passed off as evidence.

The whole of Darwinism, once you remove what little real empirical evidence exists in their literature, is a long pseudo-intellectual fairy tale like narrative of “could have, may have, must have, we assume, we believe” statements.

I don’t expect them to show up … ever.

372. John A. Davison - March 19, 2011

Gary,

While I can’t disagree with your conclusion, what troubles me is where are those who agree with my assessment? My book, which is a treasure trove exposing the Darwinian fairy tale, is hardly a best seller. The simple truth is that the Darwinians continue to do what they have always done. They have no critics and never had any. Atheist Darwinism has invaded every aspect of our decaying civilization with devastating damage to our existence even as a species. God or Gods, real or imaginary, are powerful requisites for a successful civilization and when they are abandoned those civilizations collapse.

Incidentally, our evolutionary science is entirely materialistic and postulates nothing beyond what the evidence demands. I defy anyone to detect a scintilla of supernatural mysticism in anything I have ever written or was written by any of my sources with the possible exception of Pierre Grasse who mentioned God only in passing, identifying Him apparently as the male Judeo-Christian God of the Old and New Testaments. Our science makes no such presumptions and I am on record stating that there is no more reason to assume a single “God” than there is to assume a single origin of life. No one knows a damn thing about God or Gods and I have said that as well. It is a serious error to grant the Darwinians any quarter whatsoever. Their most effective critics have never been religious fanatics and their frantic attempts to paint them as such is ridiculous, cowardly and mendacious.

Atheist Darwinism reigns supreme. I have wasted the last quarter of a century doing everything in my power to counter its pernicious influence including offering a valid testable alternative which also does not exist. Neither my Semi-Meiotic Hypothesis (SMH) nor my Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis (PEH) exist in the contemporary evolutionary literature. As I predicted in the Afterword of my book, that will continue long after I am gone. That too was “prescribed” like everything else, probably millions of years ago.

“Everything is determined… by forces over which we have no control.”
Albert Einstein

Thanks for the comment.

P.S. The following link will take you to my position with respect to religions and their role in science.

http://www.investigatingatheism.info/johnadavison.html

Unfortunately, that blog has died with nothing new in years.

P.S. added March 22, 2011

Not only is there no reason to postulate a single “God,” there is certainly no reason for that “God” to be male. The male in the history of evolution has always been anti-evolutionary because sexual reproduction is impotent and cannot produce new species. That remains my position and has yet to be found to be without foundation. Sexual reproduction can be effective in spreading newly formed true species but it cannot produce them. They don’t call her “Mother Nature” for nothing.

A male Jehovah is nothing but male chauvinism.

“The main source of the present-day conflicts between the spheres of religion and science lies in the concept of a personal God.”
Albert Einstein

373. John A. Davison - April 26, 2011

I left a message on the following new blog –

http://www.scienceforeveryone.org/2011/04/intro-to-scientific-thinking-right.html#comments

It was:

Saori

“A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.”
John A. Davison

jadavison.wordpress.com
————————————————

Be sure to visit this new blog to witness whether or not dissent is yet to be tolerated. Saori’s new blog is now on trial.

P.S. My comments have disappeared and so have everyone else’s!

374. John A. Davison - April 26, 2011

http://forums.bcseweb.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2629&p=26594#p26594

I just posted a comment on the above weblog. I hope others will join us with this opportunity to evaluate the Darwinian proposition in what I hope will be a civil exchange.

P.S. I was just informed that I have been permanently banned for life without explanation. The British Centre for Science Education has been tested and found wanting as an organ for the rational discussion of organic evolution. My first message was ignored. My second one exposed Richard Dawkins and Pee Zee Myers as propagandists for Universal Atheism. That is what resulted in my instant banishment.

My summary banishment serves as a grim reminder that atheist inspired Darwinism still reigns supreme in the English speaking world. The notion that anyone can still take seriously the hideous machinations of Dawkins and Myers frightens me and should ever other thinking human being. These two intellectual tyrants are revered by thousands, protected by like minded, psudonymous, cowardly, mental dwarfs, not one of whom ever had an original idea in his life.

It is hard to believe isn’t it?

Not at all. It is a matter of record.

“Five hudred years ago science revolted against theological dogma as the source of all knowledge. Today it is science that is trying to assume the mantle of truth… They have become so dogmatic that anyone who questions this belief is considered a heretic who should be ridiculed into silence.”
Ben Wiker

375. John A. Davison - April 27, 2011

When I attempted to comment on the above weblog I received the folowing notice –
———————————————
Information
You have been permanently banned from this board.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

A ban has been issued on your username.
—————————————————

I emailed the Board Administrator twice asking for an explanation with no response. I will keep you up to date on this revealing development.

376. G. Hitch - April 27, 2011

What a surprise huh?

The British Center for Selling Evolution is obviously no smarter and just as dishonest as the National Center for Selling Evolution.

Darwinists are proving themselves over and over again to be first class losers as well 3rd class scientists.

377. John A. Davison - April 28, 2011

Gary Hitch

There is nothing wrong with “selling evolution.” We need more of that. It is only the means by which evolution took place (past tense) that has ever been the issue. Darwinism doesn’t qualify even as an hypothesis because it makes no predictions.

A key to our position resides in the contemporary absence of speciation. I have repeatedly challenged the Darwinists to provide an example of an extant species and its known immediate ancestor. I can’t even gain their attention. Like all my predecessors, I too do not exist. We are witnessing intellectual cowardice on a monolithic, unprecedented scale. Furthermore, the Darwinians are not third rate scientists. They are not scientists by any criterion. Scientists test hypotheses. The Darwinists don’t have an hypothesis to test. They are hide bound bigots, victims of their predestined fate to be a permanent scar on the face of science, living proof of Einstein’s appraisal presented to the Spinoza Society in 1932, 79 years ago!

“Our actions should be based on the ever-present awareness that human beings in their thinking, feeling, and acting are not free but are just as causally bound as the stars in their motion.”
Alice Calaprice, The New Quotable Einstein, page 200

and

“Everyrthing is determined… by forces over which we have no control.”
page 198

and

“Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and its springs from the same source….They are creatures who can’t hear the music of the spheres.”
page 204

Thanks for the comment.
————————————————————
P.S. This message was emailed to the major proponents of the Darwinian hoax, Paul Zachary Myers, Wesley Royce Elsberry, Clinton Richard Dawkins, and to others to verify it was sent.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

I love it so!
——————————————————–
Message edited and expanded April 30, 2011

378. John A. Davison - April 29, 2011

What more can I do?

Here is an idea. Since the “Three Stooges” of evolutionary science insist on ignoring us, I appeal to their followers to remind their arrogant leaders that they have always had critics. Surely the “minions” of Paul Zachary Myers expect Myers to put John A. Davison out of his misery. Isn’t that what leaders are for, to destroy the enemy? What kind of leaders are Myers, Dawkins and Elsberry as they absorb our naked contempt without response? Why aren’t they responding in kind? Have they no confidence, no courage, no conviction? These are questions that you followers should be asking of your leaders. I read your blogs and never see our name mentioned. Is it possible that you thousands of adoring disciples are just as insecure as your heroes? Could that be why you insist, with few exceptions, on hiding your identities?

So I expect to see some action as I continue to remind your leaders that everything they believe is a mirage, that natural selection is anti-evolutionary, that sexual reproduction is incompetent as an evolutionary mechanism and that creative evolution is no longer in progress. In short: there is absolutely nothing in Darwin’ Victorian fantasy to support its grandiose title – “On The Origin Of Species” – not a word. That leaves only one conceivable explanation: evolution was planned and the plan is now complete.

P.S. This message emailed to the top three Darwinian blowhards with copies to others for verification.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

I love it so!

379. John A. Davison - May 24, 2011

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/05/ive_had_enough.php#comments

Here we see Pee Zee Myers in all his bloated, egomaniacal glory, evoking over 300 knee jerk responses from his adoring flock of pseudonymous sheep. What a pathetic excuse for a human being. The man obviously has no self esteem whatsoever.

“In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep.”
Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, page 28.

It is hard to believe isn’t it?

Not at all. It is a matter of record.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

I love it so!

——————————————————————————————

The above message sent to the usual targets of our utter contempt – the Dawkins/Myers/Elsberry Axis of Evil.

380. John A. Davison - May 24, 2011

http://www.staustinreview.com/ink_desk/archives/the_evolution_controversy_on_the_links_that_are_missing

I have been commenting on the above weblog and so far have found a receptive audience. I ask others to offer their opinions in a venue willing to hear new opinions. The have become rare as hen’s teeth.

381. John A. Davison - June 20, 2011

http://americaneedsfatima.blogspot.com/2011/06/please-join-us-for-reception-and.html#comment-form

I just sent a message to the above site. As you can see, it has appeared.

382. John A. Davison - June 20, 2011

I just left a message on Martin Cadra’s blog. It was directed at “derwood” a pseudonymous coward. Pseudonymy is disgusting. I don’t tolerate it here and no one else should either.

http://cadra.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/john-davisons-evolutionary-manifesto/

383. John A. Davison - June 21, 2011

And so it goes, month after month, year after year, as we leave unanswered challenges wherever I am still allowed to speak. When will it become certain that our adversaries are powerless, unable to counter the truth? That should have happened long ago. It hasn’t because the Darwinista and the Fundamentalista both lack the intellectual and ethical fiber to abandon their failed assumptions and accept the only rational alternative, a phylogenesis planned from beginning to end. They are trapped by their congenital agendas which render them paralyzed and silent. They are pathetic, all of them!

“A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.”

Just remember that it was John A. Davison who was never answered, never even allowed to exist!

“Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority.”
Thomas Henry Huxley

And every one of those rejections was strongly resisted before eventually being achieved.

It doesn’t get any better than this.

P.S.This message amplified and emailed to the Moran/Elsberry/Myers/Dawkins Axis of Darwinian damn foolishness, the most absurd proposition in the history of science.

384. John A. Davison - January 17, 2012

I am revisiting this thread which I haven’t used since June 21, 2011. It is primarily to remind my readers that the title of this thread, “Evolution is Finished!,” has yet to be demonstrated to be without foundation. Once again we see the Darwinista doing what they have always done – pretending that they have never had credible adversaries.

“A doctrine which is unable to maintain itself in clear light, but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind with uncalculable harm to human progress.”
Albert Einstein

This message sent to the “Big 4 of Darwinian mysticism” plus Stuart Campbell.

385. John A. Davison - January 21, 2012

With the notable exception of Stuart Campbell, a graduate student at Cornell, not a single response has appeared to counter our several claims concerning the status of organic evolution at the present time. Similarly, there has been no reaction from the Fundamentalista. Both camps seem content to dismiss our science as of no consequence as they continue to pretend that their only adversaries are each other, oblivious to the fact that we long ago dismissed both of their ideologically driven dogmas as without merit with no validity whatsoever.

Below is a summary of our position as based on the nature of the fossil record and the indelible truth as revealed by the experimental laboratory.

1. Sexual reproduction is impotent as a device for speciation. It has never been validated by experiment and I do not believe it ever will be. It is our conviction that true species can only be produced through semi-meiosis as I first proposed in 1984. Accordingly, Mendelian genetics is impotent to initiate new species and can only act after the new species has been produced.

2. Since new species seem no longer to be appearing, we have drawn the reasonable conclusion that creative evolution is no longer in progress.

3. It follows from these demonstrations that evolution is finished, the title of this thread. This means that the current biota, both plant and animal, is the climax of a Planned scenario in which chance has played at best a trivial role.

As always, I invite evidence presented here or anywhere else that our thesis is inadequate. We have no intention of abandoning our position until forced to by experimental evidence proving that our evolutionary thesis lacks validity.

P.S. This message sent to the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticism plus Stuart Campbell and terminated with R.S.V.P.

386. John A. Davison - January 22, 2012

Unable to restrain himself, below is Stuart Campbell’s knee jerk response to the above message.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
I also have a theory: John Davison is God. It was he that created life, and he now reaches out to us in the form of a wizened, senile old coot to remind us of that. He also goes by AhuraMazda.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

“Fools rush in wnere angels fear to tread.”

Thank you Stuart Campbell.

387. John A. Davison - January 22, 2012

http://www.cultureofscience.com/2011/12/01/did-humans-evolve-from-earlier-species/#comment-16896

Here is another website completely dominated by Darwinian mysticism. Please note how we have been received there.

388. John A. Davison - January 23, 2012

Here below is the latest from Stuart Campbell, the only Darwinian on the face of the earth with the confidence openly to confront us in any way.
__________________________________________________

You’re no authority, johnny. Whimper, whimper.

sc

His email is titled – “John Davison is finished!” and is copied to not a single Darwinian crony.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

By now Mr. Campbell must realize that he hasn’t a supporter in his Darwinian world. That explains why he shares his vitriol with none of them. They are much too cowardly to call attantion to us in any way.

Mr. Stuart Campbell,
I have no inention of retiring from the most important struggle in the history of science. I have no idea where you got the mistaken notion that I was finished. I’m just getting warmed up. It is Darwinism that has been finished countless times. It prevails for one reason only. It is the only acceptable thesis for the congenital atheist mentality. The Darwinian hoax is the most persistent scandal in the history of science. That anyone can still take it seriously is nothing short of a miracle.

Please don’t stop Mr. Campbell. You are my only contact with the Darwinista and I relish your attacks on my character. They define you perfectly just as Paul Zachary Myers words defined him long before you.

P.S. This message sent to the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticsm plus Stuart Campbell.

389. John A. Davison - January 23, 2012

Well come on you atheist Darwinian zealots. Attack us with your real identities so we can respond with ours. Your silence indicates your monumental ignorance, your mortal fear and your inability to engage with a real scientist. So far Mr. Stuart Campbell is the only one who insults us using his real name. Surely there must be others, but are there? So far he is all alone with not a single vocal ally. Silence is no defense in any event.

“Nobody ever defended anything successfully. There is only attack and attack and attack some more.”
George S Patton

It doesn’t get any better than this.

390. John A. Davison - January 25, 2012

Here is a challenge for the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticism and Stuart Campbell, their only visible representative. Name a diploid higher plant or animal (true species) whose diploid ancestor is known. No gradualism please as that is not acceptable as you can plainly see.

“We might as well stop looking for the missing links as they never existed….The first bird hatched from a reptilian egg.”
Otto Schindewolf, as quoted by Richard B. Goldschmidt, The Material Basis of Evolution, page 395.

Sent to the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticism and Stuart Campbell.

It was signed R.S.V.P. in red!

Edit added January 26, 2012.
What is most revealing is the silence with which my challenge has been met. Not even Stuart Campbell, character assassin extraordinaire, has offered a response to my simple challenge. I hope my many visitors, ten so far today, fully appreciate the significance of the silence with which our position continues to be met. It is apparent that our atheist Darwinian adversaries are paralyzed with impotence when confronted with the core of their pathetic ideology – that speciation is still in progress.

P.S. This message sent to the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticim and Stuart Campbell.

391. John A. Davison - January 28, 2012

Always ready with another insult. Stuart Campell responded with –

“what a charlatan you are!”

There was much more of course but that one is sufficient to establish both his character and his monumental ignorance of the history of evolutionary science.

“He who establishes his argument by noise and command, shows that his reason is weak.”
Michel de Montaigne

392. John A. Davison - January 28, 2012

Below is my latest message to the Big 4 of Darwinian mysticsm followed vy Stuart Campbell’s reply.

Gentlemen,

From my email –

Always ready with another insult. Stuart Campbell responded with –

“what a charlatan you are!”

There was much more of course but that one is sufficient to establish both his character and his monumental ignorance of the history of evolutionary science.

As for Stuart Campbell –

“He who establishes his argument by noise and command, shows that his reason is weak.”
Michel de Montaigne

I now charge all five of you with the most heinous of all intellectual crimes, your steadfast refusal to recognize your many intellectual adversaries. The worst offender by far is Clinton Richard Dawkins who has never recognized his adversaries even long enough to insult them. He has established himself as the self anointed, self appointed leader of the atheist inspired Darwinian cult.

Einstein dismissed such types with –

“Whoever sets himself up as judge in the field of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.”
Ideas and Opinions, page 28.

I will not end this message with another R.S.V.P. as I have learned that you are all incapable of civil discourse.

Instead I will borrow a comment from Samuel Johnson –

“I never desire to converse with a man who has written more than he has read.”

Enjoy your fleeting last moments on the stage of evolutionary science.

____________________________________________________________________________

Campbell’s spirited, instant reply –

ALL of these ridiculous quotes apply to you. You should listen to yourself, and your noisy, pompous, judgemental nonsense. And when you’re done, listen, cause you can hear them laughing at you. They’re ALL laughing at you. Can you hear them? Laughing… I can hear Peter laughing now…

“To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead”. – Thomas Paine (hint: you’re the dead one, Johnny).

ha ha.
___________________________________________________________________________I I hear nothing from any quarter except from Stuart Campbell.

It keeps getting better and better!

I love it so!

393. John A. Davison - January 28, 2012

As for all you spineless,
silent supporters of our science –

“The bravest man on earth is he who stands alone.”
Henrick Ibsen


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: